Organisational Overview
What the organisation is telling you.
Evidence depth, sentiment, and AI-synthesised insight from completed interviews. Respondent identities stay private.
Analysis
59
Sessions
5
Topics
53/100
Avg evidence depth
627
Evidence Fragments
Workload sustainability
Most explored
Evidence depth by topic
Change & Learning
4 dimensions · avg across 59 sessions
Customer & Delivery
4 dimensions · avg across 59 sessions
People & Culture
4 dimensions · avg across 59 sessions
Strategy & Direction
4 dimensions · avg across 59 sessions
Ways of Working
4 dimensions · avg across 59 sessions
Evidence depth
How deeply the interviews explored each topic. Select a topic to see its dimensions.
Dimensions ranked by the share of respondents whose interview covered them well. Anything under the 50% line is a gap worth a follow-up interview or a pulse.
13 of 20 under 50%Show all 20 dimensions
Average evidence depth per topic, one dot per group, joined by the range between them. A long line means one group's interviews went much deeper than another's.
Groups with fewer than 5 interviewed respondents are left out, as are people with no value recorded.
Each dot is one interview's average evidence depth across every dimension. Interviews that ended early or stayed shallow sit in the shaded zone.
59 interviews · 0 under 30Shaded: averaging under 30, below “partial · surface” across the plan — too thin to rely on.
Sentiment Breakdown
Evidence sentiment distribution
Evidence Quality Matrix
Evidence depth × confidence · bubble = evidence count · colour = sentiment